Fig 20. Relationship between further dissemination and implementation of findings when the year of publication is (a) 2000 (b) 2005…………………………………………............ 48 Fig 21. The relationship between implementation of findings and author affiliations when the research is based in (a) developed countries (b) developing countries………………….._48
Fig 22. Journal level differences (a) in practical implementation of research findings (b) in proportion of papers with findings applicable at a species level…………………………. 50 Fig 23. Relationship between IUCN listing status and uptake of findings……………………....._ 51 Fig 24. The proportion of findings implemented according to IUCN listing status of the species (a) when recommendations were made (b) when recommendations were not made……………………………………………………………………………………....52 Fig 25. The relationship between conservation status and uptake of findings…………………... 52 Fig 26. Journal differences in the proportion of studies based in developing countries………… 53 Fig 27. Implementation of findings in developing countries according to author residence……. 54 Fig 28. Author affiliations and proportion of findings implemented as a function of author residence in developing country studies…………………………………………………… 55 Fig 29. Proportion of findings implemented in developed and developing countries when there was no resident author……………………………………………………………….. 55 Fig 30. Levels of implementation according to author affiliations when co-authors are resident to the country of study in (a) developing countries (b) developed countries...................... 56 Fig 31. Relative importance of dissemination to different stakeholders…………………….......... 58 Fig 32. The relationship between number of outlets of dissemination and uptake of
