In accordance with the test specifications in Section 2.2.3.4, the agar plates for the different dilutions for the control swatch were examined after incubation. The plates containing 100 and 101 times dilutions had uncountable colonies, while the plate with 103 times dilution had too few colonies. These plates were therefore discarded. The
plate with 102 dilutions with 253 Colony Forming Units (CFU) was selected to compare the control and test swatches.
Both dyes, when tested on their own, were found to be inactive, with uninhibited growth of bacteria (>500 CFU) in the agar plates (Figure 5.9). This is in agreement with the results published by Singh et al. [101], who reported that the dyes derived from the Acacia family do not possess intrinsic antibacterial functionality.
Figure5.9 Bacterial growth on agar plates for Thar (A) and Caspian (B) dyes
All fabric samples pad-dyed in the presence of chitosan were completely effective against E. coli. The 102 dilutions from these samples did not show any bacterial colonies after incubation and thereby exhibited 100% reduction in CFU% as calculated by Equation 2.2.
Figure 5.10 shows representative photographs of biocidal activity in the agar plates corresponding to the control fabric (A) with 253 CFU of E. coli and the test sample dyed in the presence of 0.05% chitosan (B) with no bacterial growth. The results are in agreement with earlier research, which reported antimicrobial properties of cotton fabrics treated first with chitosan by exhaust dyeing and then dyed by exhaust or padding methods [96, 176, 190, 191].The above results are summarised in Table 5.3.
Figure5.10 Agar plates control (A) and fabric dyed with Thar and 0.05% chitosan (B)
Table5.3 Antimicrobial testing results