3.2 Non-bank Financial Institutions
The formation of specialized NBFIs began in 1995 at the instigation of both the
government and the private sector. These institutions included the Business Fund
for financing small and medium sized business enterprises, the state insurance
companies “Madad” and “Uzbekinvest”, UzAIG (joint venture of AIG and NBU),
and a number of private insurance and investment companies. Unfortunately, the
information available on this sector is very limited and there is no statistical data at
all.
Since their establishment, the success of insurance companies has been
controversial. On the one hand, the range and quality of services has steadily
improved, but on the other hand, most of the insurance companies found
themselves in financial difficulty at some point. The most ambitious project – a
joint venture of the renowned AIG Corporation and National Bank of Uzbekistan
(UzAIG) - has been in financial distress for a number of years.
One of crucial difficulties in assessing the activity of non-bank financial
institutions is the absence or significant lack in regulations of this sector. There is
no requirement to publish their financial statements in the local press (as for
example in case of banks). Indeed, the accounting standards of NBFI’s have not
yet been reformed and are lacking in accuracy and presentation.
25
There were no significant attempts in Uzbekistan to reform the pension system.
The single pension fund remains state-run and no private pension institutions have
been created.
In late-1996, a new type of financial institution was created in Uzbekistan, called
the Privatisation Investment Fund (PIF). Under this PIF scheme, it was envisaged
to sell 30 percent of the shares of about 300 large enterprises to investment funds
in a first implementation phase. It was further expected that in a second phase,
shares of 300 more enterprises would be sold. Progress in implementing the
scheme has been substantially slower than originally expected, although more than
80 investment funds and management companies have been established, and about
200,000 individuals have bought shares in PIFs. The number of PIFs and volume
of their transactions have been steadily decreasing in recent years due to the fact
that performance of partially privatised enterprises has been (with very few
exceptions) very poor and consequently profitability of the PIF was low or
negative. This resulted in sharply reduced interest in the PIF’s activity among the
investors.
|