Jumaeva nasiba komil qizi lexical and semantic characteristics of hyponomic relations in words in english and

part of the speech of verb “to clean”. Also, the notion of the word that indicate the 
action which called verb "clean" seems to be more semantically distant from the 
meaning of its superordinate "dust". According to famous English linguist 
Christian Fellbaum said, "An alternative way to think about verb taxonomies - one 
that reflects the prominence of the two levels, L+l and L0 - is in terms of a radial 
structure, or cluster, with unelaborated L+l verbs like walk, talk, hit, and fight in 
the center and their troponyms march, strut; lisp, babble; tap, slam; battle, joust, 
66
Jumabaeva J.SH. Turli tizimli tillarda leksik va stilistik graduonomiya. Toshkent. Mumtoz so’z. 2007.b.11-115. 
66
Talmy L. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Shopen, T. (ed.), Language typology and 
syntactic description, 3, Grammatical categories and the lexicon. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1985. - P. 
57-149. 
67
Rosch, E., Mervis C. B. Gray W, Johnson D and Boyes-Braem. Basic Objects in Natural Categories. Cognitive 
psychology 8. 1976. -P. 382-439. 

---

64 
etc., clustered around them".
68
In giving it as clear way, the layer of the words can 
be gone from top to the bottom that is being more concrete and specific step by 
step. 
3.2. Lexical features of hyponymic relations in the words of Uzbek and 
English languages. 
In recent years, the study of linguistics and learning the specialized language 
has becoming undergoing a ‘cognitive shift’ which places a greater focus on more 
conceptual representations and knowledge organizations. Additionally, much 
researches have targeted the development of semi-automatized procedures for 
exracting especially for hyponymic term pairs and its relationship in language 
systems. Although recent studied linguistic works have focused on other 
conceptual relations, such as meronymy, hyponymy, casuality and function, 
hyponymy is considered that it is a complex relation that requires a more in-depth 
study and research. According to the English linguist Barriere ’s opinion and Gil-
Berrozpe and Faber’s opinions “As the backbone of hierarchical organization, it 
entails both categorization and property inheritance. Moreover, it is characterized 
by a variety of nuances and dimensions that should be further exploited
69
. 
In this pilot study, we reconstructed the taxonomies of rain ( a natural 
entity) and melting (a natural process). The results of this hierarchies were given 
as its foundation of the resaerch process of the default modifier word sketch , from 
which hyponymy can be extracted by analyzing the composition of multiword 
terms; a customized word sketch based on hyponymic knowledge pattern, where 
hyponymy was explicitly conveyed in the texts. The results showed that hyponymy 
subtypes were based on the semantic category of the concept, and were constrained 
by the nature of the concept, namely, whether it was an entity or a process. This 
paper presents the results of a new study on hyponymy subtypes that includes 
68
Fellbaum C. English Verbs as a SemanticNet. Princetown University. 2016. - P. 279-299. 
69
Barrière, Caroline. Building a Concept Hierarchy from Corpus Analysis. Terminology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: 
John Benjamins. 2004. 10(2). – P. 241–263. 
Juan Carlos Gil Berrozpe. Corpus-Based Identification Of Hyponymy Subtypes And Knowledge Patterns In The 
Environmental Domain. Universidad De Granada. Máster Universitario En Traducción Profesiona. 2017. - P. 9-12 

---

65 
concepts belonging to a wider range of semantic categories (e.g. activities, 
chemical elements, landforms, element, phenomenon, process etc.), and analyzes 
the behavior of the knowledge patterns used to extract hyponymic relations. 
When we come to study and research the hyponymic relations in word, we 
come across several categories of the researching the hyponymy subtype in this 
paper, they are following categories which are considered important in analyzing 
the hyponyms, the first one is ID number of the hypernym; hypernym; general 
semantic category of the hypernym; hyponym; semantic category of the 
hyponym; hyponymy subtype derived from the hypernym-hyponym pair. For 
example, if we can give instance for analyzing the word according to these 
categories, let’s consider the word “soil”.