He thought he would write to Gillingham to inquire his views,
and what he thought of his, Phillotson’s, sending a letter to her.
Gillingham replied, naturally, that now she was gone it were best to
let her be; and considered that if she were anybody’s wife she was the
wife of the man to whom she had borne three children and owed
such tragical adventures. Probably, as his attachment to her seemed
unusually strong, the singular pair would make their union legal in
course of time, and all would be well, and decent, and in order.
‘But they won’t––Sue won’t!’ exclaimed Phillotson to himself.
‘Gillingham is so matter-of-fact. She’s a
ffected by Christminster
sentiment and teaching. I can see her views on the indissolubility of
marriage well enough, and I know where she got them. They are not
mine; but I shall make use of them to further mine.’
He wrote a brief reply to Gillingham. ‘I know I am entirely wrong,
but I don’t agree with you. As to her having lived with and had three
children by him, my feeling is (though I can advance no logical or
moral defence of it, on the old lines) that it has done little more than
finish her education. I shall write to her, and learn whether what that
woman said is true or no.’
As he had made up his mind to do this before he had written to his
friend, there had not been much reason for writing to the latter at all.
However, it was Phillotson’s way to act thus.
He accordingly addressed a carefully considered epistle to Sue,
and, knowing her emotional temperament, threw a Rhadamanthine
strictness into the lines here and there, carefully hiding his heterodox
feelings, not to frighten her. He stated that, it having come to his
knowledge that her views had considerably changed, he felt com-
pelled to say that his own, too, were largely modi
fied by events
subsequent to their parting. He would not conceal from her that
passionate love had little to do with his communication. It arose from
a wish to make their lives, if not a success, at least no such disastrous
failure as they threatened to become, through his acting on what he
had considered at the time a principle of justice, charity, and reason.
To indulge one’s instinctive and uncontrolled sense of justice and
right, was not, he had found, permitted with impunity in an old
civilization like ours. It was necessary to act under an acquired and
cultivated sense of the same, if you wished to enjoy an average share
of comfort and honour; and to let crude loving-kindness take care of
itself.
Dostları ilə paylaş: