eajournalbg, Journal manager, FOOD SECURITY AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SITUATION IN SERBIA AND NEIGHBOURING COUNTRIES
Table 5. Food security indicators (GFSI) that represent the strengths* in Serbia and selected
countries in the region in 2019
Indicator Serbia Bulgaria Romania Hungary Greece All countries average 1.5
Presence and quality of
food safety net programmes 100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
74.3
1.1
Change in average food
cost
98.2
98.9
99.5
98.7
99.5
96.4
1.2
Proportion of population
under global poverty line
92.7
98.0
93.0
99.3
98.1
83.5
2.7
Urban absorption capacity 91.4
92.1
98.6
95.1
85.0
82.0
3.5
Food safety
89.9
99.4
100.0
100.0
100.0
82.5
2.8
Food loss
89.4
-
95.3
93.5
87.1
84.9
1.4
Agricultural import tariffs
78.0
81.8
81.1
81.1
81.1
75.6
1.6
Access to financing for
farmer
75.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
75.0
63.9
*”Strengths” are defined as all indicators with score above 75.0 (EIU Database, GFSI 2019)
Source: Authors’ processing and interpretation of data based on EIU Database and GFSI 2019
Indicators that contribute to Serbia’s food system and food security are also “strengths”
in other countries included in the analysis. In this group of indicators with a score above
75.0, only Bulgaria has one indicator less (higher food losses), while other neighbouring
countries have larger number of indicators that represent “strengths”. The same indicators
5 Over the last five years, relative food costs have been increasing worldwide, leading to a
steady increase in the price of the average food basket (EIU, 2019).
6 These indicators include existence of an agency to ensure safety and health of food, access to
cooling possibilities (cooling devices) and electricity presented as percentage of population
with access to potable water, ability to store food safely etc.
