France (1831), a one-hundred-character, six-act play about a previously
censored subject during the reign of King Charles X. The play epitomized
Romantic theater through its multiplicity of settings, expansive timeline,
and its use of historical themes, amplified by dramatic fictional elements,
such as the spy Dumas created to weave together various scenes in
Napoléon’s career. For Dumas, this historically vast epic also was
trenchantly personal given his father’s act of defiance against Napoléon
thirty years prior. Having challenged the hubris of Napoléon’s Egyptian
campaign that imperiled French soldiers under his command, General
Thomas-Alexandre Dumas was subsequently scorned by Napoléon,
imprisoned for a time in Italy after getting captured during his return to
France, and denied his rightful pension despite his failing health and young
family.
Dumas’s next dramaturgical triumph, entitled Antony (1831),
incorporated autobiographical elements of his turbulent affair with Mélanie
Waldor. Gautier described the premiere of this play in his memoirs as “an
agitation, a tumult, an effervescence.”
14
The young hero, Antony, falls in
love with the married Adèle, who tries to resist his overtures and distance
herself from the temptation of her suitor. However, Antony throws himself
in front of her carriage, thus coercing her to acknowledge him and help dress
his wounds. Adèle then leaves Paris to join her husband stationed in
Strasbourg, but Antony joins her there and she yields to her desire for him.
Faced with ignominy and the consequent disgrace of her daughter, Adèle
implores Antony to kill her. He does so, and to restore her honor, he
confesses to her murder and claims she brought it upon herself by resisting
him. As Gautier attests, the audience erupted and Dumas captivated Paris
with his work’s unbridled passion and unmitigated violence. Dumas also
enticed the highbrow crowd to venture into one of the Boulevard theaters
despite their tawdry reputation for bourgeois melodrama.
15
Antony
subsequently permeated the cultural imagination, inspiring young dandies
to adopt the Byronic chic and melancholy air of the protagonist at their
fashionable salon gatherings. Not yet even thirty years old, Dumas had
gained immense notoriety and profitability.
Dumas succeeded again with La Tour de Nesle (1832), a macabre and
orgiastic melodrama originally conceived by a young, provincial playwright,
Frédéric Gaillardet. The contribution of multiple playwrights to one script
was common practice in the French theater, where several works underwent
Ovations and Omissions
5
revision by various contributors. Dumas’s use of this collaborative writing
in his later novelistic endeavors would result in a drama of its own.
While inciting critics who deemed Romantic theater a bastion of
turpitude, La Tour de Nesle animated Parisian audiences despite their
elegiac mood: a cholera epidemic was ravaging the city at the time,
decimating the population and depleting its store of coffins.
16
Dumas had
fallen ill soon after having tea with Liszt, but still completed the script of
La Tour de Nesle in his febrile state without succumbing to the disease.
17
Audiences also embraced his 1834 work, Catherine Howard, a retelling
of the fate of the fifth wife of King Henry VIII of England, replete with
passion and violence in a sepulchral setting. However, the critics again
excoriated him for what they saw as the deliberate debauchery of his work.
Following immense theatrical success in the early 1830s, Dumas
experienced several years of financial flux, and critical and romantic
histrionics on and off the stage. Incessant negotiations with directors and
actors depleted him, and his debts mounted with each production. Dumas
reinvigorated himself by traveling extensively through Switzerland, Italy,
Germany, Russia, North Africa, and the Middle East. Between 1834 and
1848, he published ten accounts of his travels, giving rise to the genre now
known as travel writing.
Dumas’s subsequent foray into fiction may have been due to the
vicissitudes of theater or his appetite for challenge and recognition, as
evinced by his ambition to enter the Académie Française. He began this
campaign by appealing to friends with literary clout, such as Hugo and
Nodier.
18
This goal would never come to fruition, a slight often attributed to
malicious scrutiny of his indulgent lifestyle, commercial success, and
prodigious output.
Critique of Dumas’s behavior may have been inevitable at the time,
given his flagrant flouting of social convention, many mistresses, and
numerous illegitimate children.
19
However, profitability and prolificity
have been disproportionately attributed to Dumas, even though they can be
correlated to epochal changes in the Romantic literary landscape: new
printing techniques, reader demographics, and the advent of serialized
fiction.
The innovations in printing, as summarized by scholar Michael
Moriarty, involved “a combination of cheaper paper (produced mechanically
in continuous rolls), faster presses (powered by steam, integrating the
various phases of the printing process into a singular mechanism) and more
economical methods of producing the text (the stereotype).”
20
Consequently, the inexpensive profusion of transient media, such as daily
newspapers, rose with the growing population of readers among the
Chapter One
6
increasing middle class. These technological advances, coupled with
expanding readership, increased both supply and demand for fiction,
especially for diverting narrative. This convergence of events engendered a
new genre: serialized fiction (also known as the roman-feuilleton or
Dostları ilə paylaş: |